糖心Vlog

UCU militants press for maximum strike force

Higher education committee censured as call to launch tougher actions against employers is聽passed at UCU congress

Published on
June 5, 2014
Last updated
June 10, 2015

Source: B.Cook/Demotix/PA

Bolder course of action: marking boycotts will 鈥榤aximise our capacity to respond to draconian pay stoppages鈥, said the union

Higher education staff will be asked to commit to longer and more frequent strikes in future pay disputes after militant elements within the University and College Union won a series of policy victories.

Under a strategy set by delegates at this year鈥檚 UCU congress, held in Manchester on 29 and 30 May, staff will be asked to 鈥渕ove towards two-day and three-day rolling regional strikes鈥 and 鈥渆scalating sector-wide strikes鈥 as the union seeks to negotiate an improved pay deal.

Academics will also be asked to implement marking boycotts in the spring term 鈥渟o as to maximise our capacity to respond to draconian pay stoppages鈥, according to another motion passed by congress, the union鈥檚 main policymaking body.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The adoption of a bolder course of strike action was the result of a show of force by more radical union members unhappy with the UCU鈥檚 handling of this year鈥檚 pay dispute.

That action came to an end last month after 84 per cent of members who voted in a ballot accepted a 2 per cent pay increase in 2014-15 just before a planned marking boycott was set to begin.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

However, many delegates claimed that the decision to undertake a series of two-hour strikes instead of starting a marking boycott in January had been a fatal blow to any hopes of improving on the 1 per cent rise that employers had offered.

In a move that exposed the union鈥檚 internal divisions, delegates voted to censure the UCU鈥檚 higher education committee 鈥 the body that led the industrial dispute 鈥 saying that it had 鈥渕ishandled鈥 the action.

The motion also criticised the committee for overturning the will of last year鈥檚 congress by retreating from a full-blown marking boycott in January.

鈥淲e had a well thought-out plan, and members were expecting a marking boycott in January, but were left in limbo until April,鈥 said Lesley McGorrigan, a University of Leeds delegate and member of the UCU Left group.

Paul Blackledge, from Leeds Metropolitan University, called the decision to de-escalate 鈥渄isastrous鈥, saying the UCU 鈥渘eeded a leadership that would get tough鈥.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

Even the union鈥檚 new president, Liz Lawrence from Sheffield Hallam University, who chaired the higher education committee during negotiations, voted to rebuke the committee鈥檚 approach to the pay dispute.

Dr Lawrence, who will lead the UCU for the next two years, said that she was frustrated by the pay negotiations. 鈥淐ould we have achieved more with a different strategy 鈥 the answer is probably 鈥榶es鈥,鈥 she told 糖心Vlog.

A painful shift

However, Michael MacNeil, the UCU鈥檚 head of bargaining, refused to apologise for the strategy. He said that a marking boycott at the beginning of the year would have failed because many universities did not have exams in early spring and therefore could not participate in any action. 鈥淲e shifted tactics not without controversy nor without pain鈥ut the combination of these tactics and the threat of a marking boycott got employers to move [their offer],鈥 he said.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

The official rebuke of the UCU鈥檚 elected higher education committee was criticised by some delegates, who were concerned that it exposed the union鈥檚 weaknesses.

Harriet Bradley, from the University of the West of England, said that the infighting had left her 鈥渁nnoyed and ashamed鈥. It was 鈥渄isappointing鈥, she said, to see 鈥渁 union tearing itself apart 鈥 as the Left always does鈥.

Joanna de Groot, from the University of York, was elected vice-president (higher education). She too expressed disappointment with those who pushed through the censure motion and called for an early boycott. 鈥淭heir view is not one held by the majority of the membership,鈥 Dr de Groot said.

Characterising many delegates鈥 views as 鈥渙ut of touch鈥, she said that a vast majority of members had voted to accept the pay deal and did not want to have a marking boycott.

糖心Vlog

ADVERTISEMENT

鈥淚t鈥檚 a slightly patronising assumption that we do not know what the membership is thinking about this 鈥 they gave us a very clear steer on it,鈥 she said.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT